💙 В Москве наградили «попутчиков» – лучших в паллиативной помощи
В Российском Государственном Академическом Молодёжном Театре (РАМТ) впервые прошла премия «Попутчики» благотворительного фонда помощи хосписам «Вера». На сцене наградили лучших специалистов в сфере паллиативной помощи. Призовой фонд составил 4,2 миллиона рублей.
Больше подробностей о церемонии награждения – в материале❤️
💙 В Москве наградили «попутчиков» – лучших в паллиативной помощи
В Российском Государственном Академическом Молодёжном Театре (РАМТ) впервые прошла премия «Попутчики» благотворительного фонда помощи хосписам «Вера». На сцене наградили лучших специалистов в сфере паллиативной помощи. Призовой фонд составил 4,2 миллиона рублей.
Больше подробностей о церемонии награждения – в материале❤️
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. In a statement, the regulator said the search and seizure operation was carried out against seven individuals and one corporate entity at multiple locations in Ahmedabad and Bhavnagar in Gujarat, Neemuch in Madhya Pradesh, Delhi, and Mumbai. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from no
