Поправки в Трудовой Кодекс от Минэкономразвития серьезно ухудшают положение работников. Что бы не болтал Решетников про "желающих дополнительно поработать", его поправки дают дополнительные возможности работодателям по эксплуатации трудящихся. И уменьшают права последних. Предложенные нововведения смело можно отнести к пулу последних инициатив Правительства и Центробанка, ведущих к росту социального недовольства в шорочайших слоях общества. Результат может быть весьма плачевным.
Поправки в Трудовой Кодекс от Минэкономразвития серьезно ухудшают положение работников. Что бы не болтал Решетников про "желающих дополнительно поработать", его поправки дают дополнительные возможности работодателям по эксплуатации трудящихся. И уменьшают права последних. Предложенные нововведения смело можно отнести к пулу последних инициатив Правительства и Центробанка, ведущих к росту социального недовольства в шорочайших слоях общества. Результат может быть весьма плачевным.
BY ДВУГЛАВ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from no
