Депутат Европарламента и глава партии «Избирательная акция поляков Литвы – Союз христианских семей» Вальдемар Томашевский обратился в полицию по факту высказываний литовского блогера Альгиса Раманаускаса. Последний на своем канале в YouTube публично «выразил мнение», что у родителей, которые громко слушают русскую музыку или смотрят русские фильмы, нужно изымать детей, а самих родителей – расстреливать. @radiorlt
Депутат Европарламента и глава партии «Избирательная акция поляков Литвы – Союз христианских семей» Вальдемар Томашевский обратился в полицию по факту высказываний литовского блогера Альгиса Раманаускаса. Последний на своем канале в YouTube публично «выразил мнение», что у родителей, которые громко слушают русскую музыку или смотрят русские фильмы, нужно изымать детей, а самих родителей – расстреливать. @radiorlt
BY ЕЖ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from no
