Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 9698 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Гоколиный слаз | Telegram Webview: falconry_eye/12608 -
И премия "телеграм-админы года" безальтернативно уходит к администрации Телеги Первого канала. Ребята ударнейше потрудились, потерев и забанив в течение 40 минут больше 6 тысяч сообщений и аккаунтов "благодарных" зрителей в анонсе появления в Новогоднем шоу одной невнятной обезьяны в панаме. Так держать!
И премия "телеграм-админы года" безальтернативно уходит к администрации Телеги Первого канала. Ребята ударнейше потрудились, потерев и забанив в течение 40 минут больше 6 тысяч сообщений и аккаунтов "благодарных" зрителей в анонсе появления в Новогоднем шоу одной невнятной обезьяны в панаме. Так держать!
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from no