Тем временем, после эвакуации Бутырского суда, сегодня так и не состоялось оглашение приговора по уголовному делу о массовых беспорядках за участие в чатах «Что делать» (один из подсудимых — томский журналист Игорь Кузнецов). И, судя по всему, всё надолго: в связи с прекращением за истечением срока давности уголовного дела по ст. 228 УК в отношении одного из фигурнатов дела Вячеслава Абрамова, судья решила возобновить с самого начала судебное следствие.
Тем временем, после эвакуации Бутырского суда, сегодня так и не состоялось оглашение приговора по уголовному делу о массовых беспорядках за участие в чатах «Что делать» (один из подсудимых — томский журналист Игорь Кузнецов). И, судя по всему, всё надолго: в связи с прекращением за истечением срока давности уголовного дела по ст. 228 УК в отношении одного из фигурнатов дела Вячеслава Абрамова, судья решила возобновить с самого начала судебное следствие.
Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from no
