За три дня до теракта президент называет предупреждения Запада «шантажом»
Вообще, вешать всё на Украину ведь тоже чревато. Общественная динамика часто малопредсказуема. Ну хорошо, «виновата Украина». Так «какого хрена на третьем (!) году войны Киев способен устраивать такое в центре Москвы?» - может легко вопросить «среднестатистический». Опасно. Не лучше ли, не безопаснее ли даже всё повесить на мистический и сам взявший на себя ответственность ИГИЛ? Зачем огород городить?
За три дня до теракта президент называет предупреждения Запада «шантажом»
Вообще, вешать всё на Украину ведь тоже чревато. Общественная динамика часто малопредсказуема. Ну хорошо, «виновата Украина». Так «какого хрена на третьем (!) году войны Киев способен устраивать такое в центре Москвы?» - может легко вопросить «среднестатистический». Опасно. Не лучше ли, не безопаснее ли даже всё повесить на мистический и сам взявший на себя ответственность ИГИЛ? Зачем огород городить?
One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching.
from no
