Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 6452 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50
Warning: file_put_contents(): Only 4096 of 10548 bytes written, possibly out of free disk space in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 КПРФ на Кубани | Telegram Webview: kprf23/3268 -
🚩Бойцы СВО из 52-ой артиллерийской бригады ВДВ поблагодарили члена Краснодарского краевого комитета КПРФ Романа Поливоду за оказанную им помощь в приобретении снаряжения, экипировки и средств наблюдения.
Военнослужащие отметили, что всё это помогает выполнять задачи на территории столкновений с украинскими неонацистами. Враг будет повержен, а Россия – победит! - уверены бойцы.
🚩Бойцы СВО из 52-ой артиллерийской бригады ВДВ поблагодарили члена Краснодарского краевого комитета КПРФ Романа Поливоду за оказанную им помощь в приобретении снаряжения, экипировки и средств наблюдения.
Военнослужащие отметили, что всё это помогает выполнять задачи на территории столкновений с украинскими неонацистами. Враг будет повержен, а Россия – победит! - уверены бойцы.
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from no