Все с ужасом ждём назначения министром промышленности, предпринимательства и торговли Дениса Гармаева. Готового коррупционера с богатым бэкграундом. Свой бизнес развалил, теперь пришло время взяться за республиканский. Он на весь фронт своего функционала будет смотреть, как баран на новые ворота. Абсолютно не готовый человек. Зато знатный, великолепный, эффективный жополиз! Всем жополизам жополиз! Может академию открывать в этом деле.
Вот такого уровня у нас в Бурятии министры! Одна как дама легкого поведения себя ведет, другой как барыга, третий как алкаш из подворотни, четвертый - продолжите сами в комментариях.
Все с ужасом ждём назначения министром промышленности, предпринимательства и торговли Дениса Гармаева. Готового коррупционера с богатым бэкграундом. Свой бизнес развалил, теперь пришло время взяться за республиканский. Он на весь фронт своего функционала будет смотреть, как баран на новые ворота. Абсолютно не готовый человек. Зато знатный, великолепный, эффективный жополиз! Всем жополизам жополиз! Может академию открывать в этом деле.
Вот такого уровня у нас в Бурятии министры! Одна как дама легкого поведения себя ведет, другой как барыга, третий как алкаш из подворотни, четвертый - продолжите сами в комментариях.
BY Степная Бурятия
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from no
