Есть фамилии, которые Госдума не воспринимает. Спрашивай сколько угодно про работу некоторых депутатов-бесполезно. Комиссия по регламенту работает только по указке. Нет указки-будь хоть в Эмиратах, хоть на Бали-кнопка будет голосовать, горшочек будет варить. Разве нет? Докажите обратное!
Я москвич, рядовой избиратель. Где депутат ГД избранный по списку ЛДПР от Москвы?
Есть фамилии, которые Госдума не воспринимает. Спрашивай сколько угодно про работу некоторых депутатов-бесполезно. Комиссия по регламенту работает только по указке. Нет указки-будь хоть в Эмиратах, хоть на Бали-кнопка будет голосовать, горшочек будет варить. Разве нет? Докажите обратное!
Я москвич, рядовой избиратель. Где депутат ГД избранный по списку ЛДПР от Москвы?
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. "Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows.
from no
