Боец группировки "Север" в одиночку расправился с ДРГ ВСУ
Липцовское направление. Запакованные по всем НАТОвским стандартам парочка украинских ССОшников решила проникнуть на позиции К Северянам. Но там их ждал Бесстрашный воин из 11 тп, который отправил непрошенных гостей к Бандере.
Примечательно, что после ликвидации диверсантов-неудачников, по ним отработали сбросами вражеские БпЛА. На всякий случай, чтоб в плен не попали и не сболтнули лишнего.
Боец группировки "Север" в одиночку расправился с ДРГ ВСУ
Липцовское направление. Запакованные по всем НАТОвским стандартам парочка украинских ССОшников решила проникнуть на позиции К Северянам. Но там их ждал Бесстрашный воин из 11 тп, который отправил непрошенных гостей к Бандере.
Примечательно, что после ликвидации диверсантов-неудачников, по ним отработали сбросами вражеские БпЛА. На всякий случай, чтоб в плен не попали и не сболтнули лишнего.
"Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from no
