Все формальные предпосылки к благополучному исходу были. Небольшие штрафы музыканты оплатили, у участников группы было много разных паспортов — можно выбрать, куда депортироваться. Но что такое для Кремля формальности, когда хочется репрессий? Множество прецедентов (последний — с радужными сережками) доказывает, что ничего. Дело было за малым — чтобы Кремлю не мешали. А Таиланд помешал. МИД посовещался и решил России группу не выдавать. Даже такую маленькую уступку «дружественная страна» не сделала.
Все формальные предпосылки к благополучному исходу были. Небольшие штрафы музыканты оплатили, у участников группы было много разных паспортов — можно выбрать, куда депортироваться. Но что такое для Кремля формальности, когда хочется репрессий? Множество прецедентов (последний — с радужными сережками) доказывает, что ничего. Дело было за малым — чтобы Кремлю не мешали. А Таиланд помешал. МИД посовещался и решил России группу не выдавать. Даже такую маленькую уступку «дружественная страна» не сделала.
Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. The account, "War on Fakes," was created on February 24, the same day Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a "special military operation" and troops began invading Ukraine. The page is rife with disinformation, according to The Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, which studies digital extremism and published a report examining the channel. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from no
