@Rajdian считает, что в случае свержения Асада признание Абхазии и Южной Осетии будет «однозначно отозвано, а дипломатические связи разорваны».
@freedom_square же призывает не спешить с прогнозами: «после того, как повстанцы возьмут Дамаск и разберутся с режимом Асада, у них будет миллион и одно дело поважнее Южной Осетии». Более того, «если [у Сухума и Цхинвала] есть опасения по поводу отзыва признания, вероятно, имеет смысл инициировать контакты [с сирийской оппозицией]»?
@abkhazia напомнил, что «в рядах вооруженной оппозиции есть и кавказцы. Если выйти на нужных людей, можно сохранить признание».
@Sidaemon же назвал вполне вероятным сценарий, по которому признание будет отозвано у одной лишь Южной Осетии.
@Rajdian считает, что в случае свержения Асада признание Абхазии и Южной Осетии будет «однозначно отозвано, а дипломатические связи разорваны».
@freedom_square же призывает не спешить с прогнозами: «после того, как повстанцы возьмут Дамаск и разберутся с режимом Асада, у них будет миллион и одно дело поважнее Южной Осетии». Более того, «если [у Сухума и Цхинвала] есть опасения по поводу отзыва признания, вероятно, имеет смысл инициировать контакты [с сирийской оппозицией]»?
@abkhazia напомнил, что «в рядах вооруженной оппозиции есть и кавказцы. Если выйти на нужных людей, можно сохранить признание».
@Sidaemon же назвал вполне вероятным сценарий, по которому признание будет отозвано у одной лишь Южной Осетии.
BY Осетия - [æ]
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from no
