Совет по национальной безопасности: "Мы считаем, что ситуация в Амстердаме успокоилась. Израильтяне могут посещать Нидерланды".
А как же военные самолёты, эвакуация, визиты министров и спикера ? Как это можно посещать город после "Хрустальной ночи" ?
Повторяю, в Европе есть антисемиты и радикальные мусульманские организации. Но вчерашние события в Амстердаме были использованы в политических целях и раздуты свыше всяких пропорций. Это вредит интересам Израиля, интересу евреев и борьбе с антисемитизмом. Запомните то, что я говорю. Довольно скоро станут известны подробности.
Совет по национальной безопасности: "Мы считаем, что ситуация в Амстердаме успокоилась. Израильтяне могут посещать Нидерланды".
А как же военные самолёты, эвакуация, визиты министров и спикера ? Как это можно посещать город после "Хрустальной ночи" ?
Повторяю, в Европе есть антисемиты и радикальные мусульманские организации. Но вчерашние события в Амстердаме были использованы в политических целях и раздуты свыше всяких пропорций. Это вредит интересам Израиля, интересу евреев и борьбе с антисемитизмом. Запомните то, что я говорю. Довольно скоро станут известны подробности.
"Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from no
