В него внесли члена партии «Яблоко» Светлану Ганнушкину, политолога Андрея Колесникова, журналистов Глеба Пьяных и Анастасию Жвик, а также иностранную структуру Фонда борьбы с коррупцией (ФБК, признан экстремистским и запрещен в РФ), «Феминистское Антивоенное Сопротивление» и проект «Роскомсвобода».
#Россия #иноагенты @pezdicide никакой химии — только факты
В него внесли члена партии «Яблоко» Светлану Ганнушкину, политолога Андрея Колесникова, журналистов Глеба Пьяных и Анастасию Жвик, а также иностранную структуру Фонда борьбы с коррупцией (ФБК, признан экстремистским и запрещен в РФ), «Феминистское Антивоенное Сопротивление» и проект «Роскомсвобода».
#Россия #иноагенты @pezdicide никакой химии — только факты
BY Системный пестицид
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war.
from no
