❗️Замминистра обороны РФ Тимур Иванов задержан по подозрению в получении взятки, сообщили в СК
Как заявили в ведомстве, Иванов Тимур, занимающий пост замминистра обороны России, задержан по подозрению в совершении преступления, предусмотренного ч. 6 ст. 290 УК РФ — чиновник подозревается в получении взятки. Других подробностей задержания замминистра обороны следком не проводит.
❗️Замминистра обороны РФ Тимур Иванов задержан по подозрению в получении взятки, сообщили в СК
Как заявили в ведомстве, Иванов Тимур, занимающий пост замминистра обороны России, задержан по подозрению в совершении преступления, предусмотренного ч. 6 ст. 290 УК РФ — чиновник подозревается в получении взятки. Других подробностей задержания замминистра обороны следком не проводит.
Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from no
