✏️✏️✏️✏️ Бойцы из 382 батальона морской пехоты эвакуировали пожилых людей из села Борки Суджанского района, которые ранее не смогли эвакуироваться. За эти действия их командир с позывным Сокол принял решение их обнулить на передке.
✏️✏️✏️✏️ Бойцы из 382 батальона морской пехоты эвакуировали пожилых людей из села Борки Суджанского района, которые ранее не смогли эвакуироваться. За эти действия их командир с позывным Сокол принял решение их обнулить на передке.
Просимраспространить.
BY Рой ТВ - Максим Калашников
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from no
