Мария Захарова заявила, что звонок во время брифинга касался ранее заданного ей вопроса
Оправдание официального представителя МИД России приводит ТАСС: «Перед брифингом были вопросы в связи с противоречивыми материалами в интернете. Уточнила у экспертов, наша ли эта тема. Ответ пришел в ходе брифинга — МИД не комментирует. Так что интриги никакой нет».
Мария Захарова заявила, что звонок во время брифинга касался ранее заданного ей вопроса
Оправдание официального представителя МИД России приводит ТАСС: «Перед брифингом были вопросы в связи с противоречивыми материалами в интернете. Уточнила у экспертов, наша ли эта тема. Ответ пришел в ходе брифинга — МИД не комментирует. Так что интриги никакой нет».
BY SOTA
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights.
from no
