Лефортовский суд Москвы заключил под стражу по обвинению в шпионаже уроженца России, гражданина США Джина (Евгения) Спектора, ранее осужденного по делу о взятке экс-помощнице бывшего вице-премьера России Аркадия Дворковича. Об этом нам сообщили в суде.
Лефортовский суд Москвы заключил под стражу по обвинению в шпионаже уроженца России, гражданина США Джина (Евгения) Спектора, ранее осужденного по делу о взятке экс-помощнице бывшего вице-премьера России Аркадия Дворковича. Об этом нам сообщили в суде.
BY ТАСС
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from no
