Массовую драку устроили екатеринбургские и челябинские хоккеисты из детской лиги. За 50 секунд побили друг друга семь раз.
10-летние пацаны из "Юности" и "Трактора" схлестнулись на арене "Айсберг" в последнем периоде. Сначала препирались из-за пропущенных шайб (счёт 6:3 в пользу Члб), валили друг друга на лёд. Пока тренер разнимал одних, в бой вступали другие. Серьёзных травм никто не получил, только синяки.
Массовую драку устроили екатеринбургские и челябинские хоккеисты из детской лиги. За 50 секунд побили друг друга семь раз.
10-летние пацаны из "Юности" и "Трактора" схлестнулись на арене "Айсберг" в последнем периоде. Сначала препирались из-за пропущенных шайб (счёт 6:3 в пользу Члб), валили друг друга на лёд. Пока тренер разнимал одних, в бой вступали другие. Серьёзных травм никто не получил, только синяки.
What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. As a result, the pandemic saw many newcomers to Telegram, including prominent anti-vaccine activists who used the app's hands-off approach to share false information on shots, a study from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue shows. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from no
