14 декабря приглашаем зал Свободы Музея Бориса Ельцина сыграть в настольную игру «Свобода мысли», где правовые нормы закона представлены на ярких и символичных картах-иллюстрациях. Подберите свои визуальные образы прав и свобод человека или попробуйте угадать варианты других участников игры.
14 декабря приглашаем зал Свободы Музея Бориса Ельцина сыграть в настольную игру «Свобода мысли», где правовые нормы закона представлены на ярких и символичных картах-иллюстрациях. Подберите свои визуальные образы прав и свобод человека или попробуйте угадать варианты других участников игры.
Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy."
from no
