What kind orchestrated RICO crime would it be to use deceptive strategies and practices to pretend that a mentally diminished executive is doing a job he’s no longer able to do?
And this criminal conspiracy manages to operate successfully for several years before it’s exposed?
And it turns certain persons involved in this criminal cover up were enriching/benefiting themselves while keeping the conspiracy going?
In the fallout and aftermath of that criminal conspiracy being exposed, acknowledged, and admitted to, are legal challenges to any official actions undertaken by the criminals in question very strong, or would you consider such challenges to be extremely weak?
What do you think?
Oh, and Retroactively applying the 25th to Joe - backdated to the Hur report dates, nullifying everything Joe did from that date onward. Those pardons would not stand. They won't stand anyway.
The secondary part is that everyone who hid it and pretended joe was cognizant is complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the public. Hold your heads high, America.
What kind orchestrated RICO crime would it be to use deceptive strategies and practices to pretend that a mentally diminished executive is doing a job he’s no longer able to do?
And this criminal conspiracy manages to operate successfully for several years before it’s exposed?
And it turns certain persons involved in this criminal cover up were enriching/benefiting themselves while keeping the conspiracy going?
In the fallout and aftermath of that criminal conspiracy being exposed, acknowledged, and admitted to, are legal challenges to any official actions undertaken by the criminals in question very strong, or would you consider such challenges to be extremely weak?
What do you think?
Oh, and Retroactively applying the 25th to Joe - backdated to the Hur report dates, nullifying everything Joe did from that date onward. Those pardons would not stand. They won't stand anyway.
The secondary part is that everyone who hid it and pretended joe was cognizant is complicit in the fraud perpetrated on the public. Hold your heads high, America.
~BC/T
BY Out of the Dark®️ 🌔 🇺🇸 🌕
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care.
from no
