Внимание Розыгрыш🔔 Говорят бесплатный бензин не бывает, врут!) 5️⃣0️⃣литров бензина 92 ⛽️или деньгами💵 получат случайный подписчик. Для участия достаточно подписаться на наши каналы и нажать кнопку «Участвовать»
Внимание Розыгрыш🔔 Говорят бесплатный бензин не бывает, врут!) 5️⃣0️⃣литров бензина 92 ⛽️или деньгами💵 получат случайный подписчик. Для участия достаточно подписаться на наши каналы и нажать кнопку «Участвовать»
He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Two days after Russia invaded Ukraine, an account on the Telegram messaging platform posing as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy urged his armed forces to surrender. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children.
from us
