Революционное турбореактивное вооружение Ирана, долгое время считавшееся секретным. Изделие 358 - гибридное оружие, которое можно описать и как ракету и как дрон для поражения воздушных целей - БПЛА различного класса и вертолетов .
В самом Иране изделие представляется как беспилотное оружие противовоздушной обороны.
Революционное турбореактивное вооружение Ирана, долгое время считавшееся секретным. Изделие 358 - гибридное оружие, которое можно описать и как ракету и как дрон для поражения воздушных целей - БПЛА различного класса и вертолетов .
В самом Иране изделие представляется как беспилотное оружие противовоздушной обороны.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
