فرح برای من نماد ملّی نیست؛ در دوره پهلوی دیکتاتوری، خفقان، نبود آزادی بیان و وجود سیاست‌های ضد زن موج می‌زد و فرح تمام سعی خود را می‌کرد تا این دستگاه سرکوب را حفظ کند و حالا هم می‌خواهد همان دستگاه سرکوب‌گر را برگرداند! ✅@BisimchiMedia
فرح برای من نماد ملّی نیست؛ در دوره پهلوی دیکتاتوری، خفقان، نبود آزادی بیان و وجود سیاست‌های ضد زن موج می‌زد و فرح تمام سعی خود را می‌کرد تا این دستگاه سرکوب را حفظ کند و حالا هم می‌خواهد همان دستگاه سرکوب‌گر را برگرداند! ✅@BisimchiMedia
Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety.
from pl
