"руzzкіє своїх не бросають" 😏, руzzкіє своїх добивають ☠. Таке життя окупанта: народитися за 3000 км від України, приїхати на чужу землю і загинути від кулі "свого". Порада дня: не ставайте окупантами 🚫. Facebook💥Twitter
"руzzкіє своїх не бросають" 😏, руzzкіє своїх добивають ☠. Таке життя окупанта: народитися за 3000 км від України, приїхати на чужу землю і загинути від кулі "свого". Порада дня: не ставайте окупантами 🚫. Facebook💥Twitter
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from pl
