🔗 Shah®ukh (@Russell_Adlere): وطن پرستی؛ شاید این کلمه در جاهای دیگر به اندازه کافی بکار نمیرود! اما من به استفاده از کلمه وطن پرستی تأکید میکنم. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔗 𓄂2کامروا𓆃 (@imdearie2): به منحوس ترین تاریخ سال رسیدیم تاریخی که اشک شاهنشاه چکید و با قطره‌ی اشکش یه کشور ویران شد تاریخی که بعد اون ایرانی یه روز خوش ندید.. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔗 Shah®ukh (@Russell_Adlere): وطن پرستی؛ شاید این کلمه در جاهای دیگر به اندازه کافی بکار نمیرود! اما من به استفاده از کلمه وطن پرستی تأکید میکنم. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🔗 𓄂2کامروا𓆃 (@imdearie2): به منحوس ترین تاریخ سال رسیدیم تاریخی که اشک شاهنشاه چکید و با قطره‌ی اشکش یه کشور ویران شد تاریخی که بعد اون ایرانی یه روز خوش ندید.. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from pl
