đź”´LIVE ab ca. 17.00 Uhr aus Magdeburg vom Domplatz
Landwirte und Bürger planen eine Protestkundgebung am 11. November in Magdeburg, um sofortige Neuwahlen in Deutschland zu fordern. Sie kritisieren die Regierung und fordern konkrete Maßnahmen zur Rettung von Wirtschaft und ländlichem Raum.
đź”´LIVE ab ca. 17.00 Uhr aus Magdeburg vom Domplatz
Landwirte und Bürger planen eine Protestkundgebung am 11. November in Magdeburg, um sofortige Neuwahlen in Deutschland zu fordern. Sie kritisieren die Regierung und fordern konkrete Maßnahmen zur Rettung von Wirtschaft und ländlichem Raum.
On Telegram’s website, it says that Pavel Durov “supports Telegram financially and ideologically while Nikolai (Duvov)’s input is technological.” Currently, the Telegram team is based in Dubai, having moved around from Berlin, London and Singapore after departing Russia. Meanwhile, the company which owns Telegram is registered in the British Virgin Islands. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych.
from pl
