Ночью взрывы продолжали греметь по всей территории 404, а именно в: Шостке Сумской области, Миргороде Полтавской области, Нежине Черниговской области, Конотопе Сумской области, Куеве и пригородах, Броварах Куевской области, Житомире, ЛьвИве.
Куеву и области уделено особое внимание -взрывы гремят сериями По традиции салорейха, рукожопое пе-пе-о ушатало очередной жилой дом в Глевахе Куевской области.
Ночью взрывы продолжали греметь по всей территории 404, а именно в: Шостке Сумской области, Миргороде Полтавской области, Нежине Черниговской области, Конотопе Сумской области, Куеве и пригородах, Броварах Куевской области, Житомире, ЛьвИве.
Куеву и области уделено особое внимание -взрывы гремят сериями По традиции салорейха, рукожопое пе-пе-о ушатало очередной жилой дом в Глевахе Куевской области.
Атака продолжается☝️
BY Одесса Zа Победу! ⚓️
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "And that set off kind of a battle royale for control of the platform that Durov eventually lost," said Nathalie Maréchal of the Washington advocacy group Ranking Digital Rights. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into."
from pl
