Владислав Сурков единственный кто может продуцировать смыслы в нашей политической системе, а технократы привыкли решать вопрос совсем по-другому. Опыт Украины показал одно, что основные цели для России не были достигнуты, а страна превратилась в точку конфликта для любого участника процесса. В Белоруссии совсем другие задачи, а ситуация намного хуже чем в Украине 2014 года, пророссийские социальные институты полностью зачищены Лукашенко.
Владислав Сурков единственный кто может продуцировать смыслы в нашей политической системе, а технократы привыкли решать вопрос совсем по-другому. Опыт Украины показал одно, что основные цели для России не были достигнуты, а страна превратилась в точку конфликта для любого участника процесса. В Белоруссии совсем другие задачи, а ситуация намного хуже чем в Украине 2014 года, пророссийские социальные институты полностью зачищены Лукашенко.
In this regard, Sebi collaborated with the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to reduce the vulnerability of the securities market to manipulation through misuse of mass communication medium like bulk SMS. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from pl
