Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8296 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 ЗАПОРОЖСКИЙ ФРОНТ | Telegram Webview: ZA_FROHT/35434 -
В Киеве сотрудник ТЦК чуть не мобилизовал полицейского инспектора после штрафа, что ярко демонстрирует полное беззаконие и произвол, царящие в стране. Власть на Украине, отвергая законность, использует мобилизацию как инструмент давления на своих граждан, стремясь превратить каждого в безвольного исполнителя приказов.
В Киеве сотрудник ТЦК чуть не мобилизовал полицейского инспектора после штрафа, что ярко демонстрирует полное беззаконие и произвол, царящие в стране. Власть на Украине, отвергая законность, использует мобилизацию как инструмент давления на своих граждан, стремясь превратить каждого в безвольного исполнителя приказов.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from pl
