Die erste Sendung meines groĂartigen Kollegen Dirk Sattelmaier:
Das menschliche und somit fehleranfÀllige Handeln prÀgt den Justizapparat seit je. Wie steht es um die Teilnehmer des Justizalltages, und findet ein Verfahren stets ohne Ansehung der Person statt, wie uns die Augenbinde der Justitia es vorzugeben scheint? Rechtsanwalt Stefan Koslowski erklÀrt, welche Probleme entstehen, wenn Zeugen bereits durch ihre berufliche Position als Polizeibeamte im Vorteil zu sein scheinen. Prof. Martin Schwab erlÀutert die Problemstellungen einer Besorgnis des Rechtsuchenden, in die Befangenheit der Richterschaft zu geraten. Rechtsanwalt Moser macht sich Gedanken um die vermeintliche MajestÀtsbeleidigung des bayerischen MinisterprÀsidenten Söder durch den österreichischen Publizisten Gerald Grosz.
Die erste Sendung meines groĂartigen Kollegen Dirk Sattelmaier:
Das menschliche und somit fehleranfÀllige Handeln prÀgt den Justizapparat seit je. Wie steht es um die Teilnehmer des Justizalltages, und findet ein Verfahren stets ohne Ansehung der Person statt, wie uns die Augenbinde der Justitia es vorzugeben scheint? Rechtsanwalt Stefan Koslowski erklÀrt, welche Probleme entstehen, wenn Zeugen bereits durch ihre berufliche Position als Polizeibeamte im Vorteil zu sein scheinen. Prof. Martin Schwab erlÀutert die Problemstellungen einer Besorgnis des Rechtsuchenden, in die Befangenheit der Richterschaft zu geraten. Rechtsanwalt Moser macht sich Gedanken um die vermeintliche MajestÀtsbeleidigung des bayerischen MinisterprÀsidenten Söder durch den österreichischen Publizisten Gerald Grosz.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didnât want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. What distinguishes the app from competitors is its use of what's known as channels: Public or private feeds of photos and videos that can be set up by one person or an organization. The channels have become popular with on-the-ground journalists, aid workers and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who broadcasts on a Telegram channel. The channels can be followed by an unlimited number of people. Unlike Facebook, Twitter and other popular social networks, there is no advertising on Telegram and the flow of information is not driven by an algorithm. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsAppâs terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp âunless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.â But Telegram canât be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isnât as vast as WhatsAppâs, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but itâs nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said.
from pl
