Обнаружил для себя любопытную работу от PhD студента экономического факультета Harvard про то, как центральные банки могут хеджировать санкционные риски путем добавления Bitcoin в свои золото-валютные резервы (ЗВР). В работе прямые отсылки к заморозке американцами ЗВР России в этом году. Не уверен, что студент успешно защитится с такой работой, но почитать интересно.
Обнаружил для себя любопытную работу от PhD студента экономического факультета Harvard про то, как центральные банки могут хеджировать санкционные риски путем добавления Bitcoin в свои золото-валютные резервы (ЗВР). В работе прямые отсылки к заморозке американцами ЗВР России в этом году. Не уверен, что студент успешно защитится с такой работой, но почитать интересно.
BY Roman Buzko
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Either way, Durov says that he withdrew his resignation but that he was ousted from his company anyway. Subsequently, control of the company was reportedly handed to oligarchs Alisher Usmanov and Igor Sechin, both allegedly close associates of Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government.
from pl
