🇺🇦💥Момент прилета «Герани» по уже пылающей нефтебазе в Харькове
Власти города попытались скрыть факт уничтожений крупной нефтебазы, заявив, что это просто «взорвали заправку». Всего же, на данной «заправке», по имеющимся данным, хранилосьпочти 4 тысячи тонндизеля и бензина, которые огненной лавиной прошлись по окрестностям.
🇺🇦💥Момент прилета «Герани» по уже пылающей нефтебазе в Харькове
Власти города попытались скрыть факт уничтожений крупной нефтебазы, заявив, что это просто «взорвали заправку». Всего же, на данной «заправке», по имеющимся данным, хранилосьпочти 4 тысячи тонндизеля и бензина, которые огненной лавиной прошлись по окрестностям.
Пожар не могут ликвидировать до сих пор.
BY БЫСТРО
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from pl
