⚜انجمن زیست شناسی سلولی مولکولی دانشگاه خوارزمی با همکاری مجموعه علمی وینسل برگزار میکند⚜
🔆وبینار باکتریوفاژ: کاربردها و چشم انداز آینده🔆
📌مخاطبین: علاقه مندان به میکروبیولوژی
🎙مدرس: دکتر اعظم علی اصغری 💠 دکتری میکروبیولوژی، پژوهشگر میکروبیولوژی دانشگاه الزهرا
📚سرفصل ها: 🔸️تاریخچه کشف باکتریوفاژها 🔹️باکتریوفاژها و کنترل عفونت های مقاوم به آنتی بیوتیک 🔸️کاربرد باکتریوفاژها در بهداشت محیط، کشاورزی و... 🔹️روش های جداسازی، غنی سازی، خالص سازی باکتریوفاژها 🔸️چشم اندازهای آینده در استفاده از باکتریوفاژها
⚜انجمن زیست شناسی سلولی مولکولی دانشگاه خوارزمی با همکاری مجموعه علمی وینسل برگزار میکند⚜
🔆وبینار باکتریوفاژ: کاربردها و چشم انداز آینده🔆
📌مخاطبین: علاقه مندان به میکروبیولوژی
🎙مدرس: دکتر اعظم علی اصغری 💠 دکتری میکروبیولوژی، پژوهشگر میکروبیولوژی دانشگاه الزهرا
📚سرفصل ها: 🔸️تاریخچه کشف باکتریوفاژها 🔹️باکتریوفاژها و کنترل عفونت های مقاوم به آنتی بیوتیک 🔸️کاربرد باکتریوفاژها در بهداشت محیط، کشاورزی و... 🔹️روش های جداسازی، غنی سازی، خالص سازی باکتریوفاژها 🔸️چشم اندازهای آینده در استفاده از باکتریوفاژها
At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from pl
