🍻 Собрались как-то в баре Огнен Мимович, Януш Гол и Бернд Штанге… А потом каламбурошная закрылась.
Как я и писал днем, решение логичное. Я представляю, какой вой бы поднялся, если бы «Зенит» заплатил 38 миллионов евро за правого защитника Уэсли. Хотя даже слегка грустно: покупка Уэсли за такую гигантскую сумму означала бы, что нас скоро вернут в еврокубки. Иначе зачем это все?
А пока — все прозаично: аренда крепкого молодого серба, пока Караваев и Волков восстанавливаются.
Кстати, совсем не уверен, что Мантуан из-за Мимовича сядет в запас. Ответ на этот вопрос покажет только закрытый третий сбор, где Огнен и должен стартовать.
🍻 Собрались как-то в баре Огнен Мимович, Януш Гол и Бернд Штанге… А потом каламбурошная закрылась.
Как я и писал днем, решение логичное. Я представляю, какой вой бы поднялся, если бы «Зенит» заплатил 38 миллионов евро за правого защитника Уэсли. Хотя даже слегка грустно: покупка Уэсли за такую гигантскую сумму означала бы, что нас скоро вернут в еврокубки. Иначе зачем это все?
А пока — все прозаично: аренда крепкого молодого серба, пока Караваев и Волков восстанавливаются.
Кстати, совсем не уверен, что Мантуан из-за Мимовича сядет в запас. Ответ на этот вопрос покажет только закрытый третий сбор, где Огнен и должен стартовать.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion.
from pl
