23 ноября не пропустите встречу с Екатериной Шульман и Максимом Курниковым во Франкфурте!
Тема: «Русская ссылка: ожидание и реальность. Чиновники, политики, писатели, мыслители в местах столь отдалённых». Во второй части спикеры традиционно ответят на вопросы из зала.
🗺Ждем вас 23 ноября в 19:00 в Jahrhunderthalle Club по адресу Pfaffenwiese 301
23 ноября не пропустите встречу с Екатериной Шульман и Максимом Курниковым во Франкфурте!
Тема: «Русская ссылка: ожидание и реальность. Чиновники, политики, писатели, мыслители в местах столь отдалённых». Во второй части спикеры традиционно ответят на вопросы из зала.
🗺Ждем вас 23 ноября в 19:00 в Jahrhunderthalle Club по адресу Pfaffenwiese 301
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities.
from pl
