Ishlab chiqarish korxonalarining soliq qarzdorligi
2024-yil 1-sentabr holatiga soliq qarzi 100 mln so'mdan yuqori ishlab chiqarish korxonalari 774 ta, ularning jami qarzdorligi 1 376,6 mlrdso'm. Shundan 478,2 mlrd so‘mi, ya'ni 34,7 %i soliq qarzi eng ko‘p bo‘lgan 10 ta korxona hisobiga to‘g‘ri keladi.
📊Hududlar kesimida ishlab chiqarish korxonalarining soliq qarzdorligi ko‘rsatkichlari – TOP-3:
📍Andijon viloyati – 317,9 mlrd so‘m; 📍Yirik soliq to‘lovchilar bo‘yicha HSI – 204,3 mlrd so‘m; 📍Toshkent viloyati – 158,8 mlrd so‘m. ____ #цифровизация #налоговая_задолженность
Налоговая задолженность производственных организаций
По состоянию на 1 сентября 2024 года у 774 организаций в производственной сфере имеется налоговая задолженность (выше 100 млн сумов) в размере 1 376,6 млрд сумов. Из них 478,2 млрд сумов или 34,7 % приходится на 10 организаций.
📊Показатели налоговой задолженности организаций в сфере производства в разрезе регионов – TOП-3:
📍Андижанская область – 317,9 млрд сумов; 📍МРИ по крупным налогоплательщикам - 204,3млрд сумов; 📍Ташкентская область – 158,8 млрд сумов.
Ishlab chiqarish korxonalarining soliq qarzdorligi
2024-yil 1-sentabr holatiga soliq qarzi 100 mln so'mdan yuqori ishlab chiqarish korxonalari 774 ta, ularning jami qarzdorligi 1 376,6 mlrdso'm. Shundan 478,2 mlrd so‘mi, ya'ni 34,7 %i soliq qarzi eng ko‘p bo‘lgan 10 ta korxona hisobiga to‘g‘ri keladi.
📊Hududlar kesimida ishlab chiqarish korxonalarining soliq qarzdorligi ko‘rsatkichlari – TOP-3:
📍Andijon viloyati – 317,9 mlrd so‘m; 📍Yirik soliq to‘lovchilar bo‘yicha HSI – 204,3 mlrd so‘m; 📍Toshkent viloyati – 158,8 mlrd so‘m. ____ #цифровизация #налоговая_задолженность
Налоговая задолженность производственных организаций
По состоянию на 1 сентября 2024 года у 774 организаций в производственной сфере имеется налоговая задолженность (выше 100 млн сумов) в размере 1 376,6 млрд сумов. Из них 478,2 млрд сумов или 34,7 % приходится на 10 организаций.
📊Показатели налоговой задолженности организаций в сфере производства в разрезе регионов – TOП-3:
📍Андижанская область – 317,9 млрд сумов; 📍МРИ по крупным налогоплательщикам - 204,3млрд сумов; 📍Ташкентская область – 158,8 млрд сумов.
The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors.
from pl
