Плакаты 1926 года. Кто-то, возможно, ужаснется, но я всегда в книгах пишу, рисую, подчеркиваю.
Мне вообще кажется, что книга без пометок - это книга, с которой не случилось диалога, которая не вызывала вообще никаких эмоций. А значит - это плохая книга:)
Плакаты 1926 года. Кто-то, возможно, ужаснется, но я всегда в книгах пишу, рисую, подчеркиваю.
Мне вообще кажется, что книга без пометок - это книга, с которой не случилось диалога, которая не вызывала вообще никаких эмоций. А значит - это плохая книга:)
Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." Also in the latest update is the ability for users to create a unique @username from the Settings page, providing others with an easy way to contact them via Search or their t.me/username link without sharing their phone number. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from pl