The best response these Wahhabis have given so far is "hurr but the Asharis takfired Ahl al-Hadith too durrr."
WOWW BREAKING NEWS GUYS
I cited exactly this back and forth takfiring in my fiqh of takfir debate. The point I made was that takfir is an easy weapon. For every single scholar and every single group, you can find another scholar who has made takfir of them. So what? If we go by that standard, there is no one who remains a Muslim!
That's exactly why the great scholars like al-Ghazali and Ibn Taymiyya, Allah have mercy on them, had the genius to step back and say, this constant civil war has to stop. We need principles for takfir, not just "imam fulan in the 3rd century takfired Abu Hanifa, therefore he's a kafir." They laid out these principles and set a very high bar. They said, we need to have more tolerance and widen the circle.
These are the things I cite and base my positions on. The Wahhabis, however, do not want to widen the circle. They want to cut out Asharis, Maturidis, and all non-Salafi Wahhabis. So they adopt a hard takfir or hard tabdi stance and wield it like a sword against me and others. But they are not consistent with their hard takfir stance and when you call them out on it, they do taqiyya.
The best response these Wahhabis have given so far is "hurr but the Asharis takfired Ahl al-Hadith too durrr."
WOWW BREAKING NEWS GUYS
I cited exactly this back and forth takfiring in my fiqh of takfir debate. The point I made was that takfir is an easy weapon. For every single scholar and every single group, you can find another scholar who has made takfir of them. So what? If we go by that standard, there is no one who remains a Muslim!
That's exactly why the great scholars like al-Ghazali and Ibn Taymiyya, Allah have mercy on them, had the genius to step back and say, this constant civil war has to stop. We need principles for takfir, not just "imam fulan in the 3rd century takfired Abu Hanifa, therefore he's a kafir." They laid out these principles and set a very high bar. They said, we need to have more tolerance and widen the circle.
These are the things I cite and base my positions on. The Wahhabis, however, do not want to widen the circle. They want to cut out Asharis, Maturidis, and all non-Salafi Wahhabis. So they adopt a hard takfir or hard tabdi stance and wield it like a sword against me and others. But they are not consistent with their hard takfir stance and when you call them out on it, they do taqiyya.
Like I said, grift is over.
BY Daniel Haqiqatjou Official
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
These entities are reportedly operating nine Telegram channels with more than five million subscribers to whom they were making recommendations on selected listed scrips. Such recommendations induced the investors to deal in the said scrips, thereby creating artificial volume and price rise. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. Continuing its crackdown against entities allegedly involved in a front-running scam using messaging app Telegram, Sebi on Thursday carried out search and seizure operations at the premises of eight entities in multiple locations across the country. As the war in Ukraine rages, the messaging app Telegram has emerged as the go-to place for unfiltered live war updates for both Ukrainian refugees and increasingly isolated Russians alike. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from pl
