1522. Обсуждала сегодня на инглише с преподкой, что «целовать друг друга в жёпы» на инглиш вроде как напрямую перевести нельзя — потому что kiss one's ass это в инглише не выражать всё лучшее и душевное, а отправка нахуй.
Я щас ещё погуглила, но не разобралась.
Внимание, вопрос лингвистам и знатокам!
По-инглишу можно ли сказать «kiss each other's asses» в значении «любиться в дёсна»? Или там тока негативные коннотации?
И если нельзя так сказать, то какой есть хороший аналог?
1522. Обсуждала сегодня на инглише с преподкой, что «целовать друг друга в жёпы» на инглиш вроде как напрямую перевести нельзя — потому что kiss one's ass это в инглише не выражать всё лучшее и душевное, а отправка нахуй.
Я щас ещё погуглила, но не разобралась.
Внимание, вопрос лингвистам и знатокам!
По-инглишу можно ли сказать «kiss each other's asses» в значении «любиться в дёсна»? Или там тока негативные коннотации?
И если нельзя так сказать, то какой есть хороший аналог?
BY Девочка-Хуевочка
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from pl
