❗️Сегодня главный редактор Grazia Алиса Жидкова приняла участие в панельной дискуссии «В свете софитов: как бренду привлечь внимание к себе» в рамках Ozon Fashion Fest, который прошел в кинотеатре «Октябрь»❗️
❗️Сегодня главный редактор Grazia Алиса Жидкова приняла участие в панельной дискуссии «В свете софитов: как бренду привлечь внимание к себе» в рамках Ozon Fashion Fest, который прошел в кинотеатре «Октябрь»❗️
BY Independent Media news
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements.
from pl
