⚠️حبيت أحذركم من بوتات الربح، مفيش حاجة اسمها الربح من بوت فكونوا اذكياء، لا بوت ربح ولا بوت عملات ولا أي كلام فاضي، الهدف هو تجميع أعضاء وبس، يوهمك انه معك نقاط واموال وعملات وهو كذب وتلاعب بالناس المساكين، دمتم سالمين، وكل عام وانتم بخير.
⚠️حبيت أحذركم من بوتات الربح، مفيش حاجة اسمها الربح من بوت فكونوا اذكياء، لا بوت ربح ولا بوت عملات ولا أي كلام فاضي، الهدف هو تجميع أعضاء وبس، يوهمك انه معك نقاط واموال وعملات وهو كذب وتلاعب بالناس المساكين، دمتم سالمين، وكل عام وانتم بخير.
BY تطبيقات إسلامية 🕌
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%. "He has to start being more proactive and to find a real solution to this situation, not stay in standby without interfering. It's a very irresponsible position from the owner of Telegram," she said.
from pl
