🟥افشاگری تکان دهنده افسر سابق امنیتی اوکراین از وجود «آزمایشگاه‌های مخوف تسلیحات بیولوژیک آمریکا» در این کشور(!)
▪️«واسیلی بروزوروف» افسر سابق سرویس امنیتی اوکراین: "پس از انقلاب رنگی فوریه 2014 در اوکراین، فعالیت نظامی بیولوژیک آمریکا در آزمایشگاه‌هایی در مناطق مختلف این کشور گسترش یافت؛ کارشناسان امنیتی اوکراینی به وضوح گفتند که آزمایشگاه‌های مورد نظر، در حال توسعه انواع جدید تسلیحات بیولوژیک علیه نژادهای خاص و انتخاب شده هستند."
🟥افشاگری تکان دهنده افسر سابق امنیتی اوکراین از وجود «آزمایشگاه‌های مخوف تسلیحات بیولوژیک آمریکا» در این کشور(!)
▪️«واسیلی بروزوروف» افسر سابق سرویس امنیتی اوکراین: "پس از انقلاب رنگی فوریه 2014 در اوکراین، فعالیت نظامی بیولوژیک آمریکا در آزمایشگاه‌هایی در مناطق مختلف این کشور گسترش یافت؛ کارشناسان امنیتی اوکراینی به وضوح گفتند که آزمایشگاه‌های مورد نظر، در حال توسعه انواع جدید تسلیحات بیولوژیک علیه نژادهای خاص و انتخاب شده هستند."
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from pl
