Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 8184 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Минобороны России | Telegram Webview: mod_russia/36803 -
⚡️Около 22.00 мск пресечена попытка киевского режима совершить террористические атаки c применением реактивной системы залпового огня RM-70 «Вампир» и тактического ракетного комплекса «Точка-У» по объектам на территории Российской Федерации.
Дежурными средствами ПВО уничтожено десять реактивных снарядов и одна ракета комплекса «Точка-У» над территорией Белгородской области.
⚡️Около 22.00 мск пресечена попытка киевского режима совершить террористические атаки c применением реактивной системы залпового огня RM-70 «Вампир» и тактического ракетного комплекса «Точка-У» по объектам на территории Российской Федерации.
Дежурными средствами ПВО уничтожено десять реактивных снарядов и одна ракета комплекса «Точка-У» над территорией Белгородской области.
Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists." The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. The perpetrators use various names to carry out the investment scams. They may also impersonate or clone licensed capital market intermediaries by using the names, logos, credentials, websites and other details of the legitimate entities to promote the illegal schemes. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from pl
