Акция началась с маленького поступка обычного парня Коли, который в это непростое время решил помогать пожилым людям с доставкой воды на верхние этажи. Его примером вдохновились активисты молодежных организаций, запустив «Эстафету добра».
Сегодня к ней уже присоединились сотни ребят со всех уголков Республики. Эстафету также поддержал Глава Донецкой Народной Республики Денис Пушилин.
Акция началась с маленького поступка обычного парня Коли, который в это непростое время решил помогать пожилым людям с доставкой воды на верхние этажи. Его примером вдохновились активисты молодежных организаций, запустив «Эстафету добра».
Сегодня к ней уже присоединились сотни ребят со всех уголков Республики. Эстафету также поддержал Глава Донецкой Народной Республики Денис Пушилин.
Не оставайся в стороне и ты ❤️
BY Молодежь ДНР
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from pl
