🔵“О рекламе”, Дэвид Огилви 🔵“Маркетинг от А до Я”, Филип Котлер 🔵“Netflix. Инсайдерская история компании, завоевавшей мир” 🔵”Интерфакс. Технология новостей” 🔵“Жесткий SMM. Выжать из соцсетей максимум” 🔵”Метод скользкой горки”, Дамир Халилов 🔵”Подкаст за две недели. От идеи до монетизации” 🔵”Экономика творчества в XXI веке”
🔵“О рекламе”, Дэвид Огилви 🔵“Маркетинг от А до Я”, Филип Котлер 🔵“Netflix. Инсайдерская история компании, завоевавшей мир” 🔵”Интерфакс. Технология новостей” 🔵“Жесткий SMM. Выжать из соцсетей максимум” 🔵”Метод скользкой горки”, Дамир Халилов 🔵”Подкаст за две недели. От идеи до монетизации” 🔵”Экономика творчества в XXI веке”
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from pl
