✅ Мы приняли решение о продлении конкурса до 31 октября. На карточках собрали ключевую информацию, которая поможет подготовить конкурсные материалы. По всем вопросам вы всегда можете нам написать — @ncipvoprosotvet
❗️ Текст положения о конкурсе доступен по QR-коду, а такжепо ссылке.
✅ Мы приняли решение о продлении конкурса до 31 октября. На карточках собрали ключевую информацию, которая поможет подготовить конкурсные материалы. По всем вопросам вы всегда можете нам написать — @ncipvoprosotvet
❗️ Текст положения о конкурсе доступен по QR-коду, а такжепо ссылке.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. 'Wild West' Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from pl
