Законопроект о запрете пропаганды чайлдфри внесли в Госдуму.
Им предлагается приравнять пропаганду отказа от деторождения к пропаганде нетрадиционных отношений (6.21 КоАП РФ) — с штрафами от 50 тысяч до 5 миллионов рублей или арест до 15 суток с выдворением для иностранцев. Под законопроектом подписались 169 депутатов
Законопроект о запрете пропаганды чайлдфри внесли в Госдуму.
Им предлагается приравнять пропаганду отказа от деторождения к пропаганде нетрадиционных отношений (6.21 КоАП РФ) — с штрафами от 50 тысяч до 5 миллионов рублей или арест до 15 суток с выдворением для иностранцев. Под законопроектом подписались 169 депутатов
This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. He floated the idea of restricting the use of Telegram in Ukraine and Russia, a suggestion that was met with fierce opposition from users. Shortly after, Durov backed off the idea. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice.
from pl
