😈Нет дела о банкротстве — не беда, ведь субсидиарка есть всегда! Новый выпуск.
Сегодня обсуждаем привлечение к субсидиарной ответственности в ситуации, когда дела о банкротстве нет. Да, так тоже можно, при чем как по основаниям Закона о банкротстве, так и по корпоративным.
Чем опасно прекращение дела о банкротстве или исключение общества из ЕГРЮЛ по решению налоговой для контролирующих лиц? Все ли потеряно для кредитора, если невозможно ввести процедуру банкротства из-за недостаточности средств даже на ее сопровождение? Ответы на все эти вопросы в новом выпуске.
😈Нет дела о банкротстве — не беда, ведь субсидиарка есть всегда! Новый выпуск.
Сегодня обсуждаем привлечение к субсидиарной ответственности в ситуации, когда дела о банкротстве нет. Да, так тоже можно, при чем как по основаниям Закона о банкротстве, так и по корпоративным.
Чем опасно прекращение дела о банкротстве или исключение общества из ЕГРЮЛ по решению налоговой для контролирующих лиц? Все ли потеряно для кредитора, если невозможно ввести процедуру банкротства из-за недостаточности средств даже на ее сопровождение? Ответы на все эти вопросы в новом выпуске.
Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from pl
