📊Рейтинг российских политконсультантов в 2024 году
📍Топ-20 федеральных политконсультантов
1. Костин Константин / 17,3 2. Табак Владимир / 16,8 3. Алиев Фирдус / 16,5 4. Казанков Григорий / 16,2 5. Гнатюк Андрей / 15,7 6. Комиссаров Алексей / 15,4 7. Карпилов Олег / 15,3 8. Саркисов Вартан / 15,1 9. Федоров Валерий / 14,7 10. Орлов Дмитрий / 14,3
11. Зверев Сергей / 13,9 12. Чеснаков Алексей / 13,8 13. Гореславский Алексей / 13,7 14. Гращенков Илья / 13,3 15. Чадаев Алексей / 13,2 16. Михайлов Сергей / 13,0 17. Минченко Евгений / 12,7 18. Быстров Петр / 12,6 19. Максимов Андрей / 12,4 20. Игнатовский Ярослав / 12,2
📊Рейтинг российских политконсультантов в 2024 году
📍Топ-20 федеральных политконсультантов
1. Костин Константин / 17,3 2. Табак Владимир / 16,8 3. Алиев Фирдус / 16,5 4. Казанков Григорий / 16,2 5. Гнатюк Андрей / 15,7 6. Комиссаров Алексей / 15,4 7. Карпилов Олег / 15,3 8. Саркисов Вартан / 15,1 9. Федоров Валерий / 14,7 10. Орлов Дмитрий / 14,3
11. Зверев Сергей / 13,9 12. Чеснаков Алексей / 13,8 13. Гореславский Алексей / 13,7 14. Гращенков Илья / 13,3 15. Чадаев Алексей / 13,2 16. Михайлов Сергей / 13,0 17. Минченко Евгений / 12,7 18. Быстров Петр / 12,6 19. Максимов Андрей / 12,4 20. Игнатовский Ярослав / 12,2
#Рейтинг
BY Политген
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from pl
